Home

Advertisement

Customize
batman

November 2009

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Previous 20

Nov. 23rd, 2009

Boromir

“Titan Maximum” Season One in Review: Go team Jerkass!

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Nov. 22nd, 2009

Boromir Claus

Quick Review: Disney’s “A Christmas Carol”

Charles Dickens’ literary classic “A Christmas Carol” is one of those stories that everyone is familiar with and has been adapted constantly. Whether it’s straight up, modernized, made into musicals or have recognizable characters playing the roles. Disney itself has adapted this tale twice before with “Mickey’s Christmas Carol” and “The Muppet Christmas Carol.” For a story done to death, any new adaptation has to bring something new to the table otherwise it will be just a boring retread.

And in spite of this newer film having Disney slapped before its title, and it being a big showcase of 3D technology, Robert Zemeckis’ latest CG exercise in uncanny valley stays fairly close to the source material. No corners cut in the story, nothing toned down for the kiddies, and it’s about as bleak and frightening, yet at the same time optimistic as the book is.

Of course people are going to be curious as to how Jim Carrey does the character of Ebenezer Scrooge, since he’s most notable at doing funny faces and being a silly comedian. What could have been a joke of a performance, Carrey actually makes Scrooge as mean and at the same time sympathetic as the character requires to be, there is no mugging or any forced comedy from him, he plays the character fairly straight. He also plays the Ghosts of Past, Present and Yet to Come, which I kind of like as a concept and Carrey does a really good job at playing all three (With the third not speaking but it is never required of the character anyway). One of my favorite sequences is the Christmas Past, as the look into Scrooge’s younger years is mostly done in one continuous digital shot without cutting away (I’m sure it’s stitched together, this being a CG film it has the same effect).

However while for the most part I don’t have problems with how the story is played out, there are a little gripes I have. Bob Cratchet (Gary Oldman) is much underused in this adaptation, and I think could have been fleshed out a bit more. Then there are the problems I have with the performance capture, it is at times very unsettling to look at these characters exaggerated features with the actor’s who portray them, especially Cratchet and Fezziwig (Bob Hoskins) who don’t quite look human.

There are also moments that feel absolutely unnecessary, which were obviously added to showcase the 3D tech, but feel like unnecessary padding. Whether it is when Scrooge is rocketed off into the sky, or when being chased by the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come all of this just doesn’t seem like it needed to be in the movie. I didn’t see this in 3D but I’m certain the flaws I have about this would remain.

However the film does still retain the spirit of Charles Dickens’ prose, and backed by strong performances by Carrey. But I’m not quite sure if I can rate this a “Good” due to the fact that I do have a number of gripes which put it below. However don’t think my rating will be a deterrent as this is still a strong adaptation, but I think it has some unneeded elements added and actors that feel wasted, that bump the rating down for me:



End of Rant

Nov. 21st, 2009

rowsdower

Tor-Cha Riffs DOUBLE FEATURE: “Mr. T” and “Chuck Norris: Karate Kommandos”

One pities fools and the other is... Chuck Norris.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjfX-PFnfXQ

Few Notes Here:

-For the short intros/outros I plan on inserting lines from some of my material.

-The Agony Booth who I quote in this riff has an ongoing series of reviews of the “Mister T” cartoon which can be found here: http://www.agonybooth.com/recaps/Mister_T/

-In spite of Norris’ appearance, I restrained myself from using the Nostalgia Critic’s “A-CHUCK-NORRIS” gag because A) It’s too obvious and B) I already did it in the last Tor-Cha Riff.

End of Rant

Nov. 16th, 2009

batman

Tor-Cha Riffs: “G.I. Joe: The Movie” Intro

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Nov. 9th, 2009

Agent Smith

THE END IS NEAR… AGAIN!: “2012” My Thoughts

Roland Emmerich is back and bringing out another disaster movie that preys on people’s fears on an impending doom that will wipe out humanity. I’m guessing his failure with trying to give people a history lesson last year with “10,000 B.C.” made him realize people are only interested in his crap if it involves major landmarks and cities being obliterated, it’s only made up for major failure once so far (That Lizard movie). In 2004, he brought to light people’s fears of Global Warming in “The Day After Tomorrow” (Is it just me or does he have an obsession with dates of time in his works since “Independence Day”?), now he’s preying on people’s fears of the end of an ancient Calendar with “2012” bringing along John Cusack, Amanda Peet, Danny Glover, Thandie Newton, Oliver Platt, Woody Harrelson and the Operative from “Serenity.”

And you know what… it looks just as preposterous as his last disaster film. Tell me you could take a car and drive it through a collapsing Los Angeles, without being hit by large chunks of debris or crashing into anything. Or then able to find the time to board a plane and fly through buildings as they rain glass and metal on you. The same director gave us Air Force One outflying a fireball, and a bunch of characters including Dennis Quaid and future “Prince of Persia” Jake Gyllenhaal outrun freezing air. You could probably easily predict how the rest of the movie is going to go, considering it has just about the same set-ups as other disaster films not just Emmerich’s own. Considering the massive logic holes Roland Emmerich has presented, it diminishes what else the movie has to say.

Well simply put the whole December 21st, 2012 thing has been rebuked, and there are blatantly fabricated facts in the trailers (Mayans are the earliest civilization?) it’s likely Emmerich just wants to stretch things a little in order to produce an eyegasm of visual effects without really thinking of things like accuracy, plausibility or originality. Except Sony’s marketing seems to dictate that people should take this whole thing seriously, even releasing ads that tell people to a website without mentioning the movie it promotes. All this movie is it’s just cashing in on people’s fears of what the end of the world might be, in order to make studios wallets fatter and bring about even more crappy films. Emmerich is even planning out a TV series that would take place “after the end”, so this new movie isn’t some sort of warning of the future, it’s just about making cash. To compare another Woody Harrelson 2009 movie, “Zombieland” is more credible of a movie about predicting the apocalypse.

However I fear when the movie hits this Friday with all the marketing behind it, it’s going to make loads of cash. If that will happen it will show even though directors like Michael Bay and Roland Emmerich are absolute hacks, they somehow know a winning formula that will get people’s butts in the seats.

End of Rant

Nov. 3rd, 2009

Sayid

Pilot Review: “V” (2009)

I am saying this right off the bat I have not seen any of the original “V” (The two mini-series’ nor the show), so I went into this remake with a fresh mind. For what will be a four-episode start (The rest airing after the Olympics if ratings are good), one of the problem’s I have with the first episode is pacing. Events happen way too quickly, with little character development or depth, it feels like a story for a two-hour pilot condensed into one-hour.

The problems also arise in the characters; there aren’t very many scenes where I feel much attachment to them, especially with the douchebag son of Elizabeth Mitchell’s (Juliet from “Lost”) character. It is also not enough time to ingest what has happened to the world since the Visitors arrived, while they have the details of it like protests and those that think they are a blessing, they don’t give enough screen time to these ideas to really engage me. There are also plot reveals that feel like they should have been done in later episodes, rather than putting it all up front.

As for what was good, the CG was above par for the average TV show, leading to some cool looking shots like when the people are flying to the mothership. Morena Baccarin does a good job playing the gentle looking yet obviously devious Anna leader of the Visitors. The religious sideplot is actually not that bad, and then there is an aspect about those who are planning to rebel against the Visitors that could be intriguing for the episodes to come, and I may keep watching for that.

However if there are more aspects that fail to engage me especially on a character level, it may be hard for me to care about this show as it progresses.

Verdict: An episode or two before I can really say I’m hooked.

End of Rant
Tags: , ,

Nov. 2nd, 2009

hulk

Review: “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” (Mild SPOILERS)

“Never again, Bay. Never again.”

Words I utter in distaste over the first “Transformers” movie, wherein action director Michael Bay took a cool concept like battling robots and somehow found ways to make it suck. It was a movie filled with a ton of pointless and uninteresting characters, subplots, painful scenes like the backyard part, and badly filmed/edited action, I couldn’t tell what the hell was going on a lot of the time. The only positives I could sum up was the CGI, Peter Cullen reprising his role as Optimus Prime from the cartoon show, and while he stammered a lot I could bear Shia LaBeouf’s Sam more than the rest of the cast. In spite of it being a chunk of cybertronian garbage that Wreck-Gar would carry around (“I’m good for one thing! GARBAGE!”), the movie was a hit, so a sequel was guaranteed.

Back in June the sequel “Revenge of the Fallen” hit theaters to an even worse response than the first film, including a one-star review from Roger Ebert, who actually liked the first film. Then there is internet personality Noah “Spoony” Antwiler of the “Spoony Experiment” which was filled with venomous hatred for the movie, Michael Bay, and the fans that allowed this to happen (“Fool us once, shame on Michael Bay. Fool us twice, f*** you.”) This critical response solidified by position on never to be scorned by Bay again in theaters; it all began with “Armageddon” then “Pearl Harbor” then the first “Transformers”, three strikes Bay’s out. Then… the movie went on to make $400 Million dollars and probably the lowest movie on the Rottentomatoes’ Tomato-meter to reach that much money. In spite of all the money it made, I had my soul spared of witnessing it on the big screen; however to make a full critical opinion on this film, I was curious enough to rent it. At least when you rent it on Blu-Ray or DVD you could stop it at any time you want.

Now having seen the film I can make my opinion:

It’s still garbage.

There are moments which improve over flaws from the first film, however for all that; it does several things worse than the original. It adds more Transformers, yet develops none of them, there are coherent action scenes, but they are few and far between not to mention very short, they got rid of the hackers and actually made Simmons (John Tuturro) a more competent character; yet bring in all sorts of new annoying characters Transformers and humans alike.

Bay’s tropes are still in full force, the blatant military worshipping (Given more attention than the Autobots), shooting scenes in front of sunsets, blatant sexualizing of the female characters, characters that act as dumb as Grimlock (Especially Sam’s Mom), constant editing, immature and quite insulting humor, and explosions, lots and lots of explosions. The only improvement I can see is that I can actually tell what the hell is going on in some of the action scenes, but all else has shown how much he refuses to evolve as a filmmaker, he’s like a child that way.

I will say this about the story this time around there are elements that actually kept me a little interested, trying to establish a bit more of who the Transformers are, and their history. Unfortunately they decided to focus on the bland and annoying characters. The film opens with a team of Autobots and the military who have a mission to track every Decepticon across the globe. Why couldn’t this whole movie have been about them, and have the whole Fallen/Matrix of Leadership subplot?

No… we have to know more of what’s happening with Sam and Mikaela (Megan Fox). The romantic subplot is just really badly written, why does saying “I love you” matter so much between them? Since they are all mushy anyway, I don’t think they have to express it so much vocally. Then Sam get’s a bunch of information transported into his head from the Allspark, and ends up being important again, like the movie would fall apart if he didn’t have an important role to play. Don’t even get me started on Sam’s hacker roommate Leo (Ramon Rodriguez), Simmons should have had a gun instead of a taser to put him out of his misery. Oh and the returning military guys from the last film? Neither Lennox (Josh Duhamel) nor Epps (Tyrese Gibson) are given any further development, just reduced down to stereotypical gung-ho military guys.

Then there are the autobots, more specifically the one’s they decided were worthy of screen-time. Forget Ratchet, Ironhide, the Arcees or any of the ones they don’t even bother to define enough to make me remember their names. Nope they decide to focus precious film on Skids and Mudflap (“Spongebob” himself Tom Kenny and Reno Wilson), two annoying jive-talking Autobots, who isn’t doing the accusation of racism in Michael Bay films any favors. Bumblebee is probably the one that gets the second most amount of screen-time but they decided to fracture his voice-box again, leading to more unfunny radio gags. I just feel sorry for the talented artists of ILM that had to animate the jive-talking abominations, as the CG work for the Autobots and Decepticons are still some of the finest in recent cinema, especially the underutilized Devastator.

Here is what really boils me: Why does this film series short-change the Autobots? They are the main heroes of the toy-line and cartoon series, yet Bay and his writers seem to go out of their way to just blatantly ignore or diminish their roles. Especially considering Optimus Prime (The awesome voice of Peter Cullen) is the only one of them that does anything awesome in this film, leaving the rest as primarily background decoration. They are also sidelined for a chunk of the runtime because of the tradition of big blockbusters where the United States government acts like morons. Yeah, so President Obama (Topical Bay, real topical) thinks the Decepticons are around because the Autobots are? Um, who has been at war with them for centuries and would know what the bad guys are thinking?

The only real stand-out Transformer that was interesting other than Prime was Jetfire, a Decepticon defected to the Autobots, and actually gives this film some weight story-wise. It was also nice to see them actually employing the dynamic Megatron (Hugo Weaving) and Starscream (Charles Adler) had in the show, at least that’s true to source. However I got to agree the main villain the Fallen (“Candyman” Tony Todd) turns out to be a big let-down, after all the build up to his character. As well while the concept of a human-disguised Decepticon is neat, the thing called Alice (Isabel Lucas) is just a big joke, it’s nice to see alien technology that can just get killed by getting run over by a car. Then there is those little ball-baring Decepticons which is also a neat concept but only used once. For guys wanting to take over the world, they have a few ideas but don’t try hard enough to utilize a lot of them.

What makes the whole affair worse is not just the needless filler concerning Sam going to college, but also the finale, one of the most drawn-out and tedious final battles since “Steamboy.” It makes for a good drinking game, take a shot each time you see a military vehicle prepared and launched, each time a solider gets flung into the air, each time a Autobot is seen but doesn’t do anything, a massive explosion happens… what am I kidding people would get alcohol poisoning by the end of it. As sequence was happening I could feel my inner Tom Servo rising and just wanted to scream “ENNNNND! ENNNND!”

If it weren’t for some intriguing elements and some nifty but short fights this film could have easily been a “Terrible” from me; however it teeters on the edge of that abyss in my mind that only “Dragonball Evolution” has fallen so far this year. If this isn’t the biggest example of box office draw not equating to quality filmmaking I don’t know what is. Oh and don’t give the excuse of “turning off your brain”, if it comes to that I would like to at least be entertained by what the movie has to offer, and this movie offers very little. Considering how much mega-bucks this made, I somehow feel a “Transformers 3” will somehow manage to be worse than this one.

With my Energon supplies near depleted, I shall give my rating:



End of Rant

“I have issues of my own, and it started with my mother! My ancestors have been here for centuries! My father, why, he was a wheel! The FIRST wheel! Do you know what he tranformed into?

NOTHING! But he did so with honor! DIGNTITY, damn it!” – Jetfire, which I admit is kind of amusing.
Agent Smith

James Cameron’s “Avatar” Hype: New 3-Minute Trailer (My Thoughts)

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Nov. 1st, 2009

Ghostbusters

Post-Halloween Quick Reviews: “Drag Me to Hell” and “Zombieland”

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Oct. 31st, 2009

Ghostbusters

Films-to-Game: “Evil Dead: Hail to the King” (PSOne)

“Am I insane? I wouldn't necessarily say I'm crazy. Simply because I've heard the voices and battled the godless things in the woods. But I must be crazy to believe.”

These are the words of Bruce Campbell in the opening of the game; let this be a warning of what hell is to follow.

This ad however is just awesome:



“Hail to the King” actually isn’t the first “Evil Dead” game, there was actually a game based upon the first film for the Commodore 64 back in 1984, however I doubt a lot of people who knew this fact played it when it first came out. As for the subject of the review it is the first notable “Evil Dead” game, it’s produced by THQ and Heavy Iron Studios, features Bruce Campbell reprising his role as Ash, and was its major selling point. Aside from the fact you play Ash slaying deadites, and looking like another “Resident Evil” clone, me and my brothers were hyped… and then it got scathing reviews, yet we bought and played the damn thing anyway. Maybe we thought we were going to play an underrated gem. Yeah, and I’m a Chinese Jet Pilot.

“Well hello Mr. Fancy Pants.”

The game starts out promising with a prologue to the title providing exposition recapping the events of the three films, and providing new exposition showing after the events of “Army of Darkness” (The theatrical cut obviously) he worked back at S-Mart, and even got a new girlfriend named Jenny. He is however haunted by nightmares of the cabin, and the forces of evil, so his girl get’s the brilliant idea of revisiting the place that haunts him so much. Even Ash puts it himself at the end of the prologue “Big mistake.” Then when you start up a game (“Let’s Go!” Ash says as you press New Game) they arrive at the cabin, seemingly perfect as though nothing happened, until Ash’s bad hand makes a return then turns on Knowby’s tape recorder which starts it all over again, then Jenny get’s kidnapped. Ash also has an evil version of himself again, who serves as this games head honcho. So Ash goes back to the “workshed” builds himself a chainsaw arm and sets out to recover the pages of the Necronomicon in order to fight the evil. What is particularly odd about this game is that it seems very plot heavy for a series that didn’t really focus on the story as much as the scares and sick humor, but at least the story serves as nice continuity from the movies, having such in-references as the blood on the camera from the first film, the return of Annie Knowby as a deadite even inheriting her mother’s snake neck, as well as Ash’s one-liners which you can summon by the press of a button as well as different variations of his infamous quotes (To a Tree Boss: “Yo, Tree-bitch, let’s go!”).

“You found me beautiful once.”

I will say this about the game the sound design is really good, the music by notable game composer Tommy Tallarico adds to the moody and haunting world of the game. There are also nice ambient effects, putting you in the mood being lost in a dark-and-haunting forest, the demonic sounds of the deadites as they chase or get hit by your axe, and the sounds of your chainsaw revving up. As far as voice acting Bruce is the only real standout playing Ash and his evil doppelganger (Which is essentially the same only put through a demonic filter), the other voice actors are kind of weak.

“Honey… you got real ugly.”

The presentation outside of the sound design and opening/ending cinematic are very unimpressive. The backgrounds do justice to the look of the Sam Raimi films but the character models and animations are stiff and poorly animated, the model lighting isn’t that good, not to mention the pre-rendered backgrounds means static camera angles opening up for cheap hits. The in-game cinematics are dull, aside from Bruce Campbell’s performance, the FMV’s are underwhelming, and other than Ash’s quips they are humorless and not frightening in the slightest, so it doesn’t have any of the charm of the films. The way the FMV’s play out they could have just as well been done with the in-game engine, because the characters are just as stiff, and the only reason I can see they are video is for a few more “dramatic” camera moves. I hear the Dreamcast version is a minor improvement in graphics but plays pretty much the same.

“Oh you bastards! Why are you tormenting me like this! WHY?”

Things go really downhill when you start to play the game; while it plays like the early “Resident Evil” it is nowhere near as functional or thrilling. The tank-like controls from RE apply to Ash, only he walks, runs and turns unbearably slow. The combat involves dual wielding with a chainsaw in one hand, and a melee or gun in the other hand, including Ash’s trusty Boomstick. Problem with this is that the combat is dull, what it amounts to is pushing the buttons over and over again until a deadite falls dead, occasionally doing a somewhat ineffective dodge. Another problem, no matter what weapon you have the difference in damage from the weapons you gain is very slight to say the least, you can’t tell the difference. So what else can you do? Avoid combat completely. Sorry but like Cheryl says in the first film, they aren’t going to let you leave. Deadites are constantly on your ass, and they spawn at points where getting hit by any of them combined with the wonky movement controls is just unavoidable, so you’d find yourself having no choice but to use the tedious combat system. The only thing remotely nifty is the finishers, where you impale a demon on your chainsaw and finish with the weapon you hold in your other hand, but those get really repetitive fast.

Enemies do come in a lot of forms so I’ll give it points for variety, floating deadite ghost things, possessed rednecks, warthogs, skeletons, boy scouts (it’s not often you mutilate kids in a game), medieval deadites, enemies that play dead, and more. However they still are pretty much a pain, and take a lot of hits to put down. There are also boss fights, which do break up some of the tedium but generally have obvious weak points, like the Granny-spider boss who you have to wait until she turns green, a Camp Consoler, which you have to dump rocks on by hitting some conspicuous looking stands and a boss during the second disc where using molten hot lead comes to play. For some other bosses it just takes the usual button mashing.

All the combat and boss battles are offset by numerous fetch quests and puzzles like “Resident Evil”, which needless to say are not that good enough to mention. One cool highlight though is what looks like would lead to a complicated lever puzzle; Ash just uses his boomstick to solve, a nice moment in a sea of generic quests.

“I don’t want your bullshit. Just send me back, pronto, today chop chop…”

Aside from a change of setting the second disc plays a lot like the first disc, and if you think it is going to be worth it to toil through hell to see the ending… well I’m telling you now the ending is akin to “Evil Dead II” and the original ending to “Army of Darkness”, where Ash and his girl end up in a bad situation. Ash even belts out a big “Noooooooooooo” at the end. Well I would too, not because of the ending which I feel is appropriate to the series, but having to think of what hell the programmers have inflicted on “Evil Dead” fans and gamers alike just to get to a cruel yet appropriate ending.

This king is not worth hailing to. Even if you are a curious fan this game is not worth searching, it will swallow your soul and spit you out into a giant blood geyser. Even if you are slightly interested in the story you can just view the cinematics on YouTube. If you are an unfortunate soul that has witnessed this game, I think an appropriate response would be to take it to your workshed and slice it in half with a chainsaw.

All right you screwheads, listen up! This… IS MY RATING!:



And its funny how “Hail to the King” sets up a sequel yet the next “Evil Dead” game “A Fistful of Boomstick” ignores it for a different story, which leads to an uninspired game using the engine of the Rockstar game “State of Emergency.” Then the next game “Regeneration” ignores that continuity instead goes for an alternate one taking place in one loosely based on “Evil Dead II”, copies off of games like “Devil May Cry” but actually is the most decent out of all the games.

So far no new “Evil Dead” game has been announced for this generation of consoles, but I would be very thankful if THQ didn’t try again, I’d fear what they may try and copy poorly next.

End of Rant

“Good… bad… I’m the Ash with the chainsaw.”

Oct. 30th, 2009

batman

“The Legend of Link” (A CD-I Game Dub) Part Three

The Legend Continues…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KiX3ARtRuM

A few Notes:

-Any new “subliminal” messages are mostly unintentional.

-“He stole my cup.” A bit of out-of-context humor for MST3K fans.

-It took me three tries to get the scream at the end to my liking. The other two takes will be in that “alternate takes/deleted scenes” I mention at the end.

End of Rant
Ghostbusters

Film Series In Review: “The Evil Dead” Trilogy

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Oct. 25th, 2009

batman

Oncoming Blogs (10/25)

Written Blogs News:

*Annual Halloween Reviews:

-Oct. 30th: Film Series In Review: “The Evil Dead” Trilogy. I already reviewed one Sam Raimi trilogy, now for his first. Groovy.

-Oct. 31st: Film-to-Game Review: “Evil Dead: Hail to the King”: When cool-sounding concept is made into a screw-headed disaster.

*My “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” lookback continues with a look at “Coming Out of their Shells” and some miscellaneous merchandise.

*Pilot review of the remake of “V.”

*My Top 14 Best Superhero films will come eventually.

*Nostalgia Fueled Rant: “Samurai Jack” (Series Complete)

*Possible Movie Reviews: “Zombieland”, “Drag Me to Hell”, will bite the bullet and rent “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” and “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra.”

Future Videos on YouTube:

*Tor-Cha Vlog #3: PS3 and the Games I’ve Played. A look at games I’ve played on a newly acquired system including “Killzone 2”, “inFamous”, “Batman: Arkham Asylum”, “Uncharted 2: Among Theives”, brief blurbs on “Warhawk” and “Little Big Planet.”

*“Legend of Link” (CD-I Dub) Part Three: Script is in progress, and get ready to see more of the wretched CD-I footage, more obscure references and more pathetic attempts at voice acting by yours truly.

*Fluffyman Riffs #3: “G.I. Joe: The Movie” Opening: I tear apart the awesome opening of the original G.I. Joe movie.

Content and dates of rants are subject to change.

End of Rant

Oct. 22nd, 2009

Boromir

Big Shellshock: “Turtles” Sold to Nickelodeon

After 25 years, the heroes in a half-shell goes away from the company that built it to the studio built around entertaining kids (Certainly better at it than 4Kids):

http://news.toonzone.net/articles/31520/nick-acquires-rights-for-teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-new-tv-series-and-movie

This will mean:

-No more Mirage produced “Turtles” comics.

-Due to 4Kids no longer partially holding the license the 2k3 “Turtles” is officially over. What will happen with the crossover “Turtles Forever” though?

-There will be a new “Turtles” film, but any plans of making it darker are probably going to be dashed, I doubt Nickelodeon would attach their names to that.

-A fan base shattered.

And actually “Turtles” co-creator Peter Laird has pretty sound reasons for making the sale; guy just wants to move on:

http://plairdblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/musings-about-sale.html

While it’s a bit sad to hear that a beloved property is now under the umbrella of Viacom who tries incessantly to piss everyone off, it is to say that this franchise was probably not going to last much longer under the former ownerships, especially in this economic climate. Things change, and it’s possible it’s the shot of adrenaline the franchise needs in order to make it more relevant and profitable, quality notwithstanding. I think it would all depend on who handles the new series and movie, whether it will be another “Avatar” (Engaging and well-animated. Here's an idea of who should be running it) or another “Dora the Explorer” (As in annoying and condescending).

As well, for those thinking this will affect the original cartoon’s future DVD releases, I’m certain that’s under a different license so the remaining seasons would be released unharmed by this sell.

End of Rant

Oct. 20th, 2009

Boromir

Nostalgia Fueled Rant: “Samurai Jack” (One Season In)

Like a lot of his fans my introduction to Genndy Tartakovsky was “Dexter’s Laboratory” in 1996, and I was familiar with “The Powerpuff Girls” (Same network after all) but I had a sort of aversion to any cartoon girl related (Except “Sailor Moon” oddly enough, but it was on the Toonami block). As for my introduction to “Samurai Jack” I had only seen the promos when it was premiering in 2001, and haven’t watched a single solitary episode of the four seasons it lasted, because I didn’t watch a lot of new shows when they premiered.

Interest did grow over time as I’ve heard people praising it, so I recently decided to take a look at this series from it’s beginning to its end like I did with “Justice League” last year. Here are my thoughts:



Image found on: Wikipedia

PREMISE:

“Got to get back, back to the past, Samurai Jack.” – Theme lyrics

It starts out with a young boy who would be Samurai Jack (His name doesn’t come until Episode II), his father an emperor slayed a demon called Aku (The late Mako) with a magic samurai sword, however Aku as it turns out wasn’t completely done with, so he returns in order to exact vengeance and enslave the land. Aku succeeds but would-be Jack’s mother get’s him out in time and he trains for years with various tribes and cultures around the world in order to stop Aku and save his land. He grows up (And voiced by Phil LaMarr), wields his father’s sword and is just about to put a stop to Aku once and for all but Aku pulls a trump card and sends Jack into the distant future where the demon has taken over the world. So what the rest of the series is about is Jack continually finding ways to get back to the past, and undo Aku’s tyranny from history.

WHAT I LIKED:

-The visual storytelling: One thing that set’s this show apart from Genndy’s other works is the empathsis of visuals to tell their tales as opposed to it being mainly dialogue based. There are talky episodes to be sure, but then there are episodes like Episodes I and III, where most of it’s silent. It’s style is also unique using much softer character models and an artistic look as opposed to mimicking the styles of “Dexter” and “Powerpuff”, even though the way the characters move and emote are kind of similar.

As well this is a primarily dramatic show, while it has instances of humor some of the stories plays the drama straight, may be often times unusual circumstances (Like defending a whole archeological society of dogs) it doesn’t tone down the immense importance of why Jack needs to achieve his goal. There’s still plenty of humorous stuff, the season ends on a rather twisted take on nursery rhymes as told by Aku but it goes hand-in-hand with the dramatic stuff, doesn’t take away from it.

-The cool as hell action sequences: I appreciate action animated shows that take their skills in order to make its action sequences feel unique and not repeat a lot of frames. Jack’s action sequences are both well animated and very cool to watch. The stand outs in my mind is the beetle invasion from Episode III, his battle in space in Episode V, the flashback and the fight with the three archers in Episode VII, Jack against his evil self in Episode VIII, and battling elemental guardians in Episode XII.

It’s also surprising how much violence Cartoon Network allowed, while only the first three episodes so far has had any sort of visible human blood, there are still plenty of choppings and decapitations though mainly to robots, which I’m sure how they were able to slip a lot past the censors.

-The talented voice actors (When there are voices to be heard): While I knew it was Phil LaMarr voicing Jack, it is hard to tell the same guy that got shot in the face in “Pulp Fiction” and John Stewart from “Justice League” are from the same actor as Jack. It’s to his strength though it shows how talented he is as a vocal performer, as his career also includes the Jamaican Hermes Conrad on “Futurama” and the pale Vamp from “Metal Gear Solid 2” and “4.” As for Mako I was used to hearing him as Uncle Iroh in the first two seasons of “Avatar”, but he does play a powerful demonic force very well. There are also plenty of recognizable voices like Rob Paulsen, Kevin Michael Richardson, Tom Kenny (“Spongebob”), Grey DeLise, John DiMaggio and others that voice various guest and recurring characters.

WHAT I DIDN’T QUITE LIKE:

-Can get a little self-indulgent and tedious at times: The action scenes are still cool but there are bits that can be a little bit drawn out. One instance comes very much to mind is the long stretch in Episode III when Jack is carving robotic beetles in half and showing all the oil spray out, in slow-motion, while it looks cool, it didn’t need to repeat itself so many times. Then there are all the uses of split-screen, which at times look cool, but on others it feels overdone.

AN ODD OBSERVATION:

-During the sequence where Jack is learning from various cultures, while it’s a cool sequence one part stood out as a bit odd was their depiction of an African tribe (Or at least I think it is) as completely black-skinned. As well Jack being Japanese and slightly tinted yellow is another somewhat unfortunate implication, but I’m sure people can really look past that one more. Still it isn’t as uncomfortable as seeing that old Bugs Bunny cartoon where it ends with everyone in blackface singing “Camp town Races”, it’s just something I noticed.

IMPRESSIONS FOR THE REST OF THE SHOW:

One thing I am not going to expect however is closure, they never had an episode to wrap up the overall story, and fans have been clamoring for years for Cartoon Network to produce a conclusion. While this isn’t a show that’s as episodic as say “Justice League” or “Avatar”, it still has that drive of Jack finding a way to go back to his home and frames most of the episodes I’ve seen so far, it’s sad to see shows that have plots like this and not give enough time for a definitive conclusion. This however was the show that convinced Lucas to give Genndy the job of producing the “Clone Wars” micro-series (Of course Lucas wasn’t satisfied enough to let that be and make another one).

There is a rumored “Samurai Jack” movie but time will tell whether it will come to fruition, since how much time has passed, and Genndy is right now directing a sequel to “The Dark Crystal.” I will give more of my thoughts on the rumored movie as I finish the series, which will be the next time I rant about it, considering it’s nature, a season-by-season rant might not be appropriate.

Rant to be continued...
Boromir

“The Legend of Link” (A CD-I Game Dub) Part Two

Part Two of the saga:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PONyA6_3SyE

Several notes:

-This may not be relevant to the video but I would like to mention one time “Gary the Happy Pirate” came to my school. I enjoyed it at the time and kind of inspired me to bring up an obscure reference that not a lot of people will get.

-The looping of some of the scenes are pretty lacking I know, especially the one’s involving Zelda.

-Some of the parts I just wanted to toy with various movie effects, and I think it really comes through near the end.

-You can make the argument my Luigi sounds a bit like the Monarch as well, though I’m just trying to imitate his “Hotel Mario” voice the result may make it sound similar.

-Easiest dubbing job: The “Dear Pesky Plumbers” part.

End of Rant

Oct. 17th, 2009

batman

Quick Review: “Where the Wild Things Are”

“Let the wild rumpus start!”

While I have been saying for a while that the teaser for “Where The Wild Things Are” had to be one of the most visually stunning trailers I had seen for a movie in a long time, it can tend to put my expectations too high and it would be a sucker-punch to the gut if the film itself disappointed. Not to mention the pedigree behind it, Spike Jonze who directed “Being John Malkovitch” and “Adaptation” and based upon the beloved children’s book by Maurice Sendak that I’m sure people my age have read at one point or another. I also knew coming to the theater that it has been a polarizing experience for critics and audiences alike, some complaining it’s too long, too sad or too disturbing. Now having seen the film, I have a few words to say:

This movie is incredible.

Do I need to say much more? Well I’d have to fill this rant out somehow.

What this film essentially boils down to is both the fun and turmoil of being a kid. While I didn’t quite live the childhood Max (Max Records) does, I can relate to some of the things he goes through whether it is loss, being alone, having a vivid imagination and even an uncontrollable wild side. Essentially what the Wild Things are (And I hope this doesn’t really count as a spoiler), are representations of what Max goes through in his life, while not explicitly stated, I like Spike Jonze taking a bit more of a subtle approach, rather than preaching these messages, not “talking down to kids” as he would put it.

It helps as well the actors and performers help put this through. Child actors can make or break a film like this, thankfully newcomer Max Records plays the part of Max perfectly able to convey the emotion the character goes through without being annoying or sounding like he’s reading off a script. To mention as well the voices of the Wild Things do a great job, while I’d imagine people scoff at the fact James Gandolfini (Tony freaking Soprano) plays a Wild Thing named Carol, he actually gives one of the best performances of them all, that and Lauren Ambrose who voices KW and just happen to be the ones close to Max.

Special props has to go to the production design and visual effects artists that give this imaginary world life. The Wild Things are very true to their original illustrations and feel very life-like thanks to Jim Henson’s Creature Shop who made the puppets as well as the CG artists that enhanced their facial features.

As for what this movie is for, I don’t think anyone above the age of like 10 will really get it; it’s not for really young children. The hour-and-a-half length may bother some, I mean I didn’t have a problem sitting through it; it certainly had much less annoying filler than the adaptations of Dr. Seuss works (And I haven’t even seen “The Cat In The Hat”). I’d say the journey was very interesting and introspective and those who have experienced or are experiencing childhood may feel that way too. While I’m not making that generalization to everyone, that’s certainly how I felt:



End of Rant

“I’ll eat you up I love you so.”
batman

Tor-Cha Vlog #2: R.I.P. Captain Lou and Updates

A small dedication to a recent celebrity passing plus me ranting about oncoming videos/blogs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCPTHIuqYF0

Bonus Video: “DO THE MARIO!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65uNCLBTje0

End of Rant

Oct. 15th, 2009

Boromir

Pre-Season Four Hype: The Reasons I Love “The Venture Bros.” (SPOILERS when noted)

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )
batman

“The Legend of Link” (A CD-I Game Dub) Part One

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

Previous 20

Tags

Advertisement

Customize